These are two different jobs for the same money, and they pull in opposite directions for a reason that is arithmetic rather than opinion. Deciding which one your purchase is for is the single most useful thing you can do before you shortlist anything.
Both are legitimate objectives. Neither is more sophisticated than the other. What causes trouble is holding both at once without noticing that a decision improving one usually weakens the other.
You do not have to believe anything about London to accept the next point. It follows from the definition of a yield.
Rent is the numerator, price the denominator. So any reason a property costs more without renting for proportionately more is, by definition, a lower yield. Two buyers can look at the identical flat and see different yields purely because they are dividing by different prices.
You do not need a view on the market to answer these. You need a view on your own plan, which is the part only you have.
There is a yield calculator on this site because yield can be computed from numbers you already have. There is deliberately no capital growth calculator, because one would require a forecast, and a forecast dressed up as a calculator is the most persuasive way to mislead someone.
Any tool that asks you to pick a growth rate and then projects a value has not told you anything you did not put in. The output looks like analysis and is your own assumption, compounded. If you want a view on how a specific building might behave over a specific horizon, that is a conversation with reasoning you can interrogate, not a number generated by a form.
Once the objective is clear the shortlist gets much shorter, and the trade-offs stop being surprises.
Book a Consultation